Modeling and Simulation of Static Strength Railway Bogie Bolster Using Ansys Workbench
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71225/jstn.v1i4.54Keywords:
Bolster Bogie, Static Strength, Railway, Finite Element MethodAbstract
This study aimed to ensure that plastic deformation does not occur on the structure of bolster bogie 1722 when it accommodates burdens or loads based on previously determined overload limit. The simulation in this study used the finite element method with the help of Ansys Workbench 2020. The standard of testing UIC 515-4 was employed as a reference for the simulation, notably in determining the load case. The result of static simulation on the overload showed that the maximum stress on the vertical load case was 72.764 MPa, and the maximum stress on the transverse and vertical load case (combination) was 109.9 MPa. The result of maximum vertical deflection was obtained from the case of vertical load as 0.553 mm and in the case of transverse and vertical load (combination) as 1.799 mm. The structure of the bolster design is considered safe because the maximum score of stress was under the yield strength score of the used material, namely SS400 as 245 Mpa.
References
H. Claus and W. Schiehlen, “Modeling and Simulation of Railway Bogie Structural Vibrations,” Veh. Syst. Dyn., vol. 29, no. SUPPL., pp. 538–552, 1998, doi: 10.1080/00423119808969585
Menteri Perhubungan RI, “Peraturan menteri perhubungan republik Indonesia nomor 16 tahun 2022 tentang rancang bangun dan rekayasa sarana.” Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, 2022.
J. W. Seo, H. M. Hur, H. K. Jun, S. J. Kwon, and D. H. Lee, “Fatigue Design Evaluation of Railway Bogie with Full-Scale Fatigue Test,” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 2017, 2017, doi: 10.1155/2017/5656497.
S. N. Wang, “Static analysis and size optimization for the bed of gantry milling machine based on ANSYS workbench,” Curr. Trends Comput. Sci. Mech. Autom., vol. 2, pp. 298–304, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1515/9783110584998-033/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS.
B. Budiwantoro, A. H. Masyhur, and K. Mukti, “Static load analysis of bolster frame component in metro kapsul train using finite element method,” Pros. SNTTM, vol. XVII, no. 25, 2018.
R. Pokkula and T. V. K. Gupta, “Finite element method based evaluation of bogie bolster design,” Int. J. Veh. Struct. Syst., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 160–163, 2021, doi: 10.4273/ijvss.13.02.05.
International Union of Railways, “UIC 515-4.” pp. 1–26, 1993.
Menteri Perhubungan RI, “Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan nomor: KM 41 tahun 2010 tentang standar spesifikasi teknis kereta yang ditarik lokomotif.” Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, Indonesia, 2010.
F. P. W. W. A. Wirawan, D. S. Atmaja, and F. X. P. P. Fadli Rozaq, Aji Satria Bagaskara, Modelling and Structural Analysis of Tram Railway Vehicle Body with Finite Element, vol. 1. Atlantis Press International BV, 2023. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-126-5.
S. Widi Astuti, W. Artha Wirawan, A. Zulkarnain, and D. Tri Istiantara, “Comparison of Energy Absorption and Pattern of Deformation Material Crash Box of Three Segments with Bilinear and Johnson Cook Approach,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1273, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1273/1/012078.
J. D. Chung and J. S. Pyun, “A study on analysis method considering camber for the carbody deflection of the urban transit vehicles,” Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 871, pp. 323–329, 2014, doi: 10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/AMR.871.323.
W. Artha Wirawan, A. Zulkarnain, H. Boedi Wahjono, Jamaludin, and A. Tyas Damayanti, “The Effect of Material Exposure Variations on Energy Absorption Capability and pattern of Deformation Material of Crash Box of Three Segments,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1273, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1273/1/012081.
N. Naik, V. George, and S. Kowshik, “Investigations on mesh discretization error in fem based structural analysis using Ansys,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Eng. Netw., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 17–22, 2014.
R. G. Dong, S. Sankar, and R. V. Dukkipati, “A finite element model of railway track and its application to the wheel flat problem,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 1994, doi: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1994_208_234_02.
